Capitol Insights Newsletter
Authors: Luke Schwartz and Matt Reiter
What happened in Congress this week?
The Senate Appropriations Committee marked up the Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations bill. The Senate passed legislation to create new protections for kids on social media platforms by a 91-3 vote.
The House of Representatives is out of session.
FTC and Congress Take Action Against PBMs for Price Gouging
The Federal Trade Commission has issued an interim staff report on Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) as it prepares a lawsuit against the three largest PBMs. The report paints PBMs as inflating drug costs and hurting small pharmacies. The vertical integration of PBMs has led to the three largest PBMs managing nearly 80% of prescriptions in the United States.
The report blames PBMs as a leading reason for high drug prices. The vertical integration of PBMs, acting as both health plans and pharmacies, is concerning, especially considering that three in ten Americans must ration or skip doses of medication due to high costs. Despite the importance and size of PBMs, there is little public data on them and their business practices, which is why the FTC wrote and issued this report.
The report had five key findings:
- The market for PBM services has become highly concentrated, and the largest PBMs are now also vertically integrated with the nation’s largest health insurers and specialty/retail pharmacies. As a result, PBMs now have substantial control over drug accessibility and pricing.
- The leading PBMs can and do exercise significant power over Americans’ access to drugs and the prices they pay. This power allows PBMs to dictate which drugs are available, how they are priced, and determine which pharmacies patients can use, ultimately impacting individuals’ healthcare choices and creating significant financial burdens on patients.
- Vertically integrated PBMs often have the ability and incentive to prefer their own affiliated businesses, disadvantaging independent pharmacies.
- Leading PBMs use increased concentration to enter “complex and opaque” contractual relationships that may disadvantage smaller, unaffiliated pharmacies and the patients they serve. This leads to uncertainties in reimbursement as well as operational hurdles for independent pharmacies.
- PBMs and brand drug manufacturers negotiate prescription drug rebates that are conditional on limiting access to cheaper generic alternatives. Negotiations between PBMs and drug manufacturers regarding rebates, which restrict access to more affordable generic drugs, raise concerns about the affordability and availability of cost-effective medications for patients while limiting market competition.
While an FTC lawsuit against the leading PBMs has yet to be filed, the report heavily hints that it will be coming soon along with possible regulation. The FTC warns that it will use its full authority wherever it finds evidence of unlawful practices and states that the initial evidence shared warrants further scrutiny and potential regulation.
Additionally, PBMs are facing increased scrutiny from Congress, as the House Oversight and Accountability Committee held a hearing with the CEOs of the three largest PBMs on July 23rd. During the hearing the CEOs of the three largest PBMs denied raising prices for consumers and alleged that their mission is to provide more affordable and higher quality benefits for their members, presenting an alternative narrative contrary to the FTC’s findings.
At the end of the hearing, Oversight Chairman James Comer suggested that he would support “busting up” PBMs. Comer, a Republican, believes that PBMs should not be owned by health insurance companies or be allowed to own pharmacies. Republicans and Democrats are very interested in and engaged on the issue, and they hope to hold more hearings soon. There is a bipartisan push to crack down on abuses by PBMs, and an FTC lawsuit against the leading PBMs would likely be welcomed by the Oversight Committee.
Top Stories in Healthcare Policy
CMS announced that monthly premiums for Medicare Part D drug coverage are increasing to $36.78 starting in 2025, a $2.08 monthly increase.
HHS has announced a reorganization of interoperability, artificial intelligence and cybersecurity strategy. Under this reorganization, ONC will be renamed the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy and Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ASTP/ONC).
Senator Ed Markey introduced a bill to rein in on private equity firms in healthcare. The Health Over Wealth Act would require greater transparency for private equity firms and for-profit companies that own healthcare entities.
Medicare Advantage has vast geographic quality disparities, with wealthy and majority-white places having better access to top-rated plans.
A new study shows that 95% of adults in the US hold high trust in physicians for health information.
A new analysis finds that fewer than half of adults under 50 can easily afford or access healthcare.
The FDA has approved a blood test for colorectal cancer. The test is limited to detecting early-stage colorectal cancer and does not detect most precancerous growths.
UnitedHealthcare and Humana have led to over $50 billion in reimbursements from Medicare due to upcoding. Experts are calling for more controls and standards.
Change Healthcare has begun issuing privacy breach notifications to patients impacted by the February cyberattack on the clearinghouse.